🔗 Share this article

Only two days before the New York race for mayor, Michael Lange made a significant forecast – going beyond who would win overall, and precinct by precinct. Lange, a political analyst who grew up in New York City, devoted more than ten years in left-leaning activism and emerged as something of a well-known figure this year for his deep dives into municipal statistics and polling.

He published his extremely precise forecast map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate would win while failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from one neighborhood to Bushwick to a third locale, where he forecasted (accurately) that Mamdani would triumph by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in readership and most voters leaned toward the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Trends and Unexpected Results

What was your election night?

I had to do that because they were adding around 200,000 votes into the tally frequently! I was actually a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani led the initial ballots by 12 points, but there were two big batches of votes that came in later and his lead went from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, it was possible in which yesterday went somewhat badly for him, in which the opponent would have essentially increasing his support from the earlier contest. However the winner gained half a million supporters to his initial base, and this was critical why he succeeded. He campaigned and greatly broadened his base from the first round.

Expanding Support

How did the mayor-elect get additional support from?

He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: diverse racially, it’s young, it’s renters and individuals facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the primary. Plus he further maximized his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and immigrant groups. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He created the coalition that the left always wanted to build: multiracial, young, renters and people squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were a number of supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, confined to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Voters in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president previously went for the progressive now. But it’s not that he was gaining white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the night was the sky-high turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Turnout was significantly higher than I had expected. I figured it could exceed two million, but it reached 2.3 million – which is a lot of darn voters. Existed a substantial opposition group, energized, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Right now it appears he’s likely to surpass 50%. He has 50.4% but remain around 200K ballots uncounted at that time. Thus I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he achieves it so then no one can say Sliwa was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any borough. Including one neighborhood in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump area. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo kept very white areas, affluent zones and devout communities, and then added many conservatives on Staten Island with a high participation. I think occurred a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. They were doing it prior to the former president tweeted his support for the candidate, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome if Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your much mentioned “commie corridor” – did backing for Mamdani dominant in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think there was some weakening of the progressive zone in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, instance, the Greek landlords and residents supported Cuomo. So there was a little resistance. However overall, mostly the leftist base is a key factor why Mamdani won – he scored between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the election there was coverage on whether Mamdani was making inroads with the community. Any indication that he did?

There are neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as specific locales – where he performed strongly. But in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance definitely mattered there. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, there are newcomers from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, they were pretty staunchly supportive. Therefore it’s unclear if existed major surprises here, but Mamdani retained left-leaning areas and even parts of the another locale by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what New York means politically? Will progressive base become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest figures from progressives hail from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I believe that we’ll see more of that – people will come from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

However I believe that every city in America can have their own commie corridor. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in America – because they’re young, people rent and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the inequalities we face.